McIlveen on Employment- January 2023









*|MC:SUBJECT|*






“Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from now and make a brand new ending.”

Carl Bard

NEW PRACTICE DIRECTION 

⚖️Draft copy of the new practice direction on ADR in the NI employment tribunal.

RECENT NI DECISIONS 

⚖️ Assistant Director’s claim for unfair dismissal, disability, and religious discrimination dismissed as being out of time

ALSO IN THE NEWS 

⚖️ Former Senior PSNI officer claims sex discrimination against PSNI

⚖️ Domestic Abuse Officer awarded £10k against the PSNI in disability claim for failure to make reasonable adjustments.

BAR LIBRARY ROUND UP
OF RECENT NI COURT OF APPEAL EMPLOYMENT CASES

Deman, Suresh v Queen’s University
[2022] NICA 23
Date: 12 April 2022

Keywords: Case law; Northern Ireland; Appeals; Employment; Race discrimination; Religious discrimination; Victimisation; Bias; Fair Employment Tribunal
Appellant appealing against decision of the Fair Employment Tribunal on 18 October 2019 whereby it unanimously decided the appellant had not been treated less favourably on grounds of his race or religion  –  Appellant having history of vexatious claims  –  Appellant engaging in delaying and diversionary tactics  –  Appellant challenging the case management of the case  –  Appellant seeking recusal of McCloskey LJ on ground of bias  –  Whether to decide appeal on papers  –  Whether appeal can be determined in a manner fair to both parties by the adoption of the paper mechanism  –  Appellant unsuccessful in his application for professor’s post at Queen’s University  –  Appellant not meeting selection criteria  –  Whether the Tribunal was biased  –  Whether the respondent’s procedure was directly discriminatory of the appellant in that it was intrinsically unfair and, further, was not applied fairly  –  Whether an arguable error of law on the part of the Tribunal
Decision: Appeal dismissed
 
Belhassen, Ahmed v Dobhan Ltd
[2022] NICA 10
Date: 09 March 2022

Keywords: Case law; Northern Ireland; Employment; Appeals; Unfair dismissal; Procedure; Case management
Claim for unfair dismissal  –  Challenge against orders of Tribunal  –  Appellant initiating tribunal proceedings as self-representing foreign national  –  Appellant alleging unfair dismissal due to pleading with employer for pay slips and contract of employment  – Tribunal dismissing first and second Respondents from proceedings  –  Tribunal substituting and ordering joinder of non-existent natural or legal person to proceedings  –  Appellant unable to commence proceedings against non-existent natural or legal person  –  Whether court to extend time  –  Whether orders of Tribunal sustainable in law
Decision: The impugned orders of the Tribunal are reversed

Peifer, Robert James v Southern Education and Library Board & anor
2021 NICA 66
Date: 16 December 2021

Keywords: Case law; Northern Ireland; Appeals; Sex discrimination; Damages; Victimisation; Recruitment
Appeal against the decision of Industrial Tribunal given on 20 November 2019 to award the appellant compensation in the sum of £1063 comprising £500 damages together with interest  –  Appellant appealing decision of Tribunal on grounds of not addressing range and magnitude of unequal treatment  –  Appellant claiming he had been discriminated against in a recruitment competition for the post of special needs classroom assistant at the respondent school  –  Recruitment competition re-advertised as a result of advice from the respondent board  –  appellant once again unsuccessful  –  Appellant lodging a claim alleging both sex discrimination and victimisation  –  Unfair recruitment  –  Appropriate figure for compensation  –  Whether appellant entitled to further award of compensation  – Judicature (Northern Ireland) Act 1978, section 38(1)(a)
Decision: Please refer to judgment
 
Department of Justice v McGrath, Teresa Marie
[2021] NICA 44
Date: 2 July 2021

Keywords: Case law; Northern Ireland; Appeals; Employment; Equal pay; Sex discrimination; Industrial Tribunal
Appeal by the Department of Justice from decision of the Industrial Tribunal dated 25 July 2019 holding it was in breach of the Equal Pay Act (NI) 1970 as amended and that the claimant was entitled to equal pay  –  Claimant raising grievance with employer regarding equal pay and pay on promotion  –  Claimant employed within the Northern Ireland Court Service in post of Deputy Principal in Official Solicitor’s office  –  Fluid grading  –  Post re-graded upwards to a Grade 7 post  –  Back-pay  –  Claimant asserting she had always been performing Grade 7 work  –  Tribunal finding that the claimant had been engaged by the employer in like work with her comparators  –  Whether, even though it did not form part of its pleaded case, the employer could raise a defence of genuine material factor that, unknown to senior management, the claimant’s manager was allocating work to her that was above her pay-level, and if it could, then could the actions of the manager be regarded as a genuine material factor defence.
Decision: Appeal dismissed

Holchem Laboratories Ltd v Henry, James
[2021] NICA 35
Date: 1 June 2021

Keywords; Case law; Northern Ireland; Appeals; Employment; Termination of employment; Contract terms; Unfair dismissal; Conflict of interest
Employment  –  Unfair dismissal  –  Alleged breach of employment contract  –  Judge dismissing employer’s claim against former employee alleging breach of employment contract prior to and after termination  –  Respondent seeking to appeal dismissal of Appellant’s claim in relation to pre-termination conduct of Respondent  –  Whether judge erring in law or in fact in finding Respondent not breaching any obligation of loyalty or fidelity  –  Whether judge failing to address relevant obligations of loyalty or fidelity in contract of employment
Decision:  Appeal dismissed

Walsh, Emma v Office of the Industrial Tribunal & anor
[2021] NICA 26
Date: 29 April 2021

Keywords: Case law; Northern Ireland; Appeals; Employment; Unfair dismissal; Extension of time; Contributory fault; Time limits
Appellant appealing against decision of Industrial Tribunal whereby it ruled that neither reinstatement nor re-engagement considered an appropriate remedy following finding of unfair dismissal  –  Extension of time for serving notice of appeal  – Employee appealing on grounds that tribunal had made factual errors and proceedings were unfair in that she had been unable to cross-examine author of witness statement  –  Employee serving notice of appeal 16 weeks out of time  –  Whether appeal raising any question of law or substantive question of procedural unfairness  –  Whether court should extend time  –  Rules the Court of Judicature (Northern Ireland) 1980, Order 60B, rule 1(2); Order 94 rule 2(4)(b)
Decision: Request for extension of time refused

Bryant, Grace v Nestle UK Ltd
[2021] NICA 34
Date: 4 June 2021

Keywords: Case law; Northern Ireland; Appeals; Employment; Unfair dismissal; Age discrimination; Time limits; Tribunals
Appellant appealing decision of the Industrial Tribunal refusing the appellant’s application to amend Googleher claim for unfair dismissal to include an additional claim that the termination of her employment had been unlawful on the further ground of age discrimination  –  Appellant claiming unfair dismissal by employers on ground of redundancy  –  Discovery of documents  –  Tribunal refusing application to amend claim  – Tribunal concluding Appellant acting in manner having effect of disadvantaging or misleading Respondent for tactical reasons with regard to timing and manner in which application for amendment made – Whether Tribunal decision perverse  –  Whether Tribunal decision involving error of law  –  Whether court to extend time limit to allow Appellant to amend claim to include claim for age discrimination  –  Consideration of the role of appellate court
Decision: Appeal allowed

Content credit: Bar Library, Bar of NI

To accss the full article click HERE
 

picture credit: personneltoday

For the full report click HERE

DISMISSAL OF DISABLED EMPLOYEE ON LONG TERM SICK FOUND NOT BE DISCRIMINATORY

The Claimant suffered from anxiety and depression whilst working for HMRC between May 2011 and December 2018. Between 2016 and dismissal he was absent for a total of 245 days on 23 different occasions. At the time of dismissal, he had been absent for 7 months and was unfit to return to work in any capacity. The Tribunal acknowledged that he had been dismissed due to something arising in consequence of his disability. However, it held that the Respondent could objectively justify the unfavourable treatment as a proportionate means of achieving its aim of ensuring that staff were capable of demonstrating satisfactory attendance and the efficient use of resources. The EAT upheld the decision and and found that it was “clear that the tribunal had found that the Claimant’s absence had a very real impact on HMRC’s use of resources, in particular on time management and staff morale.

£75K AWARD FOR HOSPITAL EMPLOYER’S FAILURE TO MAKE REASONABLE ADJUSTMENTS

picture credit: personneltoday.
For the full story click HERE
For the full judgment click HERE

TRAINEE METROPOLITAN POLICE OFFICER DISCRIMINATED AGAINST REGARDING PROVISION OF HEARING AIDS

Shafi Karim v Commission of the Metropolitan Police 2207504/2021
For the news story click HERE
For the full judgment click HERE
 
The Claimant was a trainee police officer with the  Metropolitan police. He claimed unfair dismissal and disability discrimination, in relation to the Respondent’s failure to pay the cost of enhanced hearing aids required in relation to his hearing disability. The Claimant said he struggled to hear instructions over his police radio and also experienced “torture” when the noise of patrol sirens heard through his regular hearing aids was amplified due to noisy “feedback.”
 
The Respondent insisted that the Claimant would need to pay 30% of the cost of procuring the hearing aids recommended by OHW. The Respondent restricted the Claimant’s duties over concern he was over-reliant on the adapted equipment before ultimately dismissing him.
.
The tribunal found that the Respondent had subjected the Claimant to indirect disability discrimination, but not direct discrimination. A remedy hearing is due to take place on 14/04/23.

EAT OVERTURNS TRIBUNAL MARITAL STATUS DISCRIMINATION DECISION

ELLIS V MS K BACON & ADVANCED FIRE SOLUTIONS LTD [2022] EAT 188
For the full judgment click HERE
 
The Claimant (Ms Bacon) was treated unfavourably and ultimately dismissed by the Appellant, Mr Ellis, the MD of her employer Advanced Fire Solutions Ltd. The ET found that Mr Ellis had discriminated against Ms Bacon because she was married.

The EAT allowed Mr Ellis’s appeal.

At para [9], the EAT stated “The issue in this case was therefore whether Mr Ellis treated Mrs Bacon in unfavourable ways…because she was married…The question is not whether she was badly treated because she was married to a particular person. Another way of looking at the issue was to ask oneself whether an unmarried woman whose circumstances were otherwise the same as hers, including being in a close relationship with Mr Baxon would have been treated differently.

At para [12] Shanks J stated “I allow the appeal…with a very heavy heart. I know Mrs Bacon was very badly treated by Mr Ellis…however I must apply the law and accordingly allow the appeal.”

For the full story click HERE


⚖️Claimant secures £11,885k in unfair dismissal claim against respondent who accused her of making deliberate mistakes to inflict financial ruin on her employer.

⚖️ Claimant secures constructive dismissal claim, against Respondent who threatened him, subject to 25% Polkey reduction and a 75% reduction for contributory conduct that prompted the threat.

⚖️Court of Appeal upholds EAT decision that a settlement agreement provided a “clean break” between parties and prevented a fresh claim against a wholly owned subsidiary of the Respondent.

⚖️Bank chief risk officer found automatically unfairly dismissed for making protected disclosures regarding regulatory and compliance issues.

⚖️Solicitor permitted to sue ex-firm for misuse of private WhatsaApp messages used as evidence to support her dimsissal.

⚖️NI Animal feeds business fined £40k in a HSENI prosecution when worker required hand amputation after being crushed by a machine when it could have easily been avoided.

⚖️Bank employee’s nickname of Christine Lagarde found not to be age discrimination.

⚖️ Afro-Caribbean BT worker secures £20k in racial harrassmnet claim when manager joked she could be deported.

ELG NI – SEMINAR ON DISABILITY AND REASONABLE ADJUSTMENTS
28TH FEBRUARY 2023

REGISTRATION AVAILABLE SOON ON THE FOLLOWING LINK

To book your place click HERE

MP’S REJECT “COUNTERPRODUCTIVE” MENOPAUSE LEAVE

For the full story click HERE

picture credit: BBC

NEW FLEXIBLE RECRUITMENT PLATFORM FOR WOMEN 

To link to the platform click HERE

m. 07752 370149   
e.  emma.mcilveen@barlibrary.com
Bar of NI Profile
The Bar Library, 91 Chichester Street, Belfast, BT1 3JQ, Northern Ireland

Tweet Tweet

Forward Forward

Copyright © 2020, Emma McIlveen, Barrister at Law, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer 

This bulletin is published by Emma McIlveen, Barrister at Law. Please note that the information and any commentary on the law contained in this bulletin is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by the author or the publisher.

The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. If you are not a solicitor, you are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site. If you are a solicitor, you should seek advice from Counsel on a formal basis.

Twitter

Website

Email

LinkedIn


This email was sent to *|EMAIL|*

why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences

*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*