McIlveen on Employment-September 2023









*|MC:SUBJECT|*






“Life starts all over again when it gets crisp in the fall.” –
F. Scott Fitzgerald

RECENT NI DECISIONS 

⚖️Domestic carer’s unfair dismissal is dismissed by IT for want of jurisdiction, when it found the working relationship was held together only by trust, and the Claimant failed to establish “even on the modest standard of the balance of probabilities that she had a contract of employment.

ALSO IN THE NEWS 

⚖️Lady Chief Justice makes new term opening address.

⚖️Causeway Coast and Glens Council denies health and safety offences relating to the death of a refuse worker struck by a bin lorry.

⚖️Belfast School reaches discrimination claim settlement for a child who had no choice but to wear nappies to school due to lack of suitable toilet facilities.

⚖️PSNI Data breach could cost the force up to £240m.

⚖️NI Law firms may face HMRC enforcement relating to years of back pay alleged to be owed to trainee solicitors.

NEW REPORT PUBLISHED ON THE COST OF EMPLOYMENT CONFLICT IN NI

To read the review click HERE

HIGH COURT JUDGE FINDS DECISION TO REPOSITION AND SUSPEND TWO OFFICERS WAS DOMINATED BY THE THREAT THAT “REPUBLICAN SUPPORT FOR POLICING WOULD BE WITHDRAWN”

To read the full decision click HERE

COMMENTS ABOUT THE “UNITED COLOURS OF BENETTON” UPHELD AS RACIAL HARASSMENT FOR RETAIL SALES ASSOCIATE, DESPITE A LACK OF CREDIBILITY REGARDING OTHER ALLEGATIONS

Miss R Grey v RL Retail Services Ltd 2207400/2020
For the full judgment click HERE

 Picture Credit: The Times

The Claimant was of mixed Caribbean and white English heritage and had been employed as a part-time Sales Associate at the Ralph Lauren flagship London store since 2015.
 

Her complaints began when a new store manager was appointed in June 2019.
 
The Claimant made several claims against the manager, regarding his treatment of her. The majority of which were not found proven by the tribunal.
 
The tribunal found both the Claimant and key Respondent witnesses unreliable and that much of the Claimant’s evidence lacked credibility. The majority of the Claimant’s complaints were therefore not proven. This gave the tribunal “pause for thought” in relation to the one allegation it did uphold of comments made by her Manager when interviewing her during a grievance.
 
The Respondent Manager was found to have said “you’re the European Union aren’t you? Your being mixed race and all…you’re the United Nations.” and “You’re the United Colours of Benetton”
The tribunal found that the Manager’s protestations that the comments did not have racial connotations were “implausible” and “were not only clumsy and careless, but offensive.”
 
The tribunal said that the language used was “patently related to the claimant’s mixed heritage.” Because of the nature of the language, it concluded that it had the purpose of creating the environment and of violating her dignity as proscribed by 26 of the EQ. The ET concluded that whilst it had not upheld the majority of the allegations this complaint was “sufficiently grievous to create the proscribed effect objectively.” In making that decision the IT took account of the matter not being a peer-to-peer comment but that made by a manager in a position of power and authority over the Claimant.

 
The claim of racial harassment was upheld, and the tribunal confirmed that in the alternative it amounted to an act of direct race discrimination because the language used was patently related to the Claimant’s mixed heritage. Her race was a significant and effective cause of the treatment.

Remedy is to be decided separately.

CLAIMANT AWARDED £64K FOR REASONABLE ADJUSTMENTS CLAIM INVOLVING MENOPAUSE SYMPTOMS

To read the full decision click HERE
To read the remedy decision click HERE

Picutre credit: Insurance Post

UNFAIR DISMISSAL AND DISCRIMINATION FOUND WHEN CLAIMANT’S AUTISM WAS NOT PROPERLY CONSIDERED DURING RESPONDENT’S INVESTIGATION OF A COMPLAINT AGAINST HIM

To read the full decision click HERE

Picutre credit: IEL.com

SOLICITOR’S CLAIM OF DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION STRUCK OUT DUE TO LACK OF  DIAGNOSIS AND THE SHORT TERM, WORK-RELATED NATURE OF HER CONDITION.

To read the full decision click HERE

FEMALE SURGEONS REPORT BEING SEXUALLY ASSAULTED BY MALE COLLEAGUES EVEN DURING SURGERY

To read the full story click HERE

BAR MANAGER LOSES UNFAIR DISMISSAL CLAIM WHEN HE REFUSED EMPLOYER’S OFFER TO RETURN TO EMPLOYMENT FOLLOWING TEMPORARY COVID “LAY-OFF”

To read the full decision click HERE
To read the news report click HERE

SRA ORDERED TO PAY £75K COSTS OF ACCUSED SOLICITOR FOR PURSUING A “SPECULATIVE” PROSECUTION

To read the full details click HERE

SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN HEALTHCARE MUST STOP – NEW GMC STANDARDS MAKE CLEAR

To read the summary and to access the new standards click HERE
 

Picture Credit. GMC-uk.org

SUMMARY OF THE ADMISSION OF HEARSAY EVIDENCE IN FITNESS TO PRACTISE PROCEEDINGS

To read the full summary click HERE

USE OF THE NAME “WA***KER” FOUND TO BE CAPABLE OF DISCRIMINATION AS A NON GENDER NEUTRAL TERM

To read the full judgment click HERE

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PROMOTES DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION

To read the full details click HERE

Picture Credit: The Independent

SHOE REPAIRER SUPPORTS FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL

To see the full range of Timpson employee initiatives click HERE
 

FLEXIBLE WORKING INCLUDES WORKING FROM ABROAD FOR COUNCIL EMPLOYEES

To read the full story click HERE

Picture credit: The Independent

WORKERS (PREDICTABLE TERMS AND CONDITIONS) BILL RECEIVES ROYAL ASSENT

To read the details click HERE
For a copy of the bill click HERE

GB EAT ISSUES NEW PRACTICE DIRECTION AND RULES OF PROCEDURE

To read the Practice Direction click HERE
For a copy of the new Rules click  HERE

NEW ADVOCACY TOOL KITS

To access toolkit no. 9 click HERE
To access toolkit no. 12 click HERE

⚖️Court of Appeal rules that a secondary school could not be held liable for tortious acts committed by a work experience placement.

⚖️Doctor wins NHS discrimination case following an investigation into her sex life when she made a claim of sexual assault.

⚖️Sandwich chain are fined £800k by the HSE after there were repeated incidents of staff becoming locked in freezer stores.

⚖️EAT finds that tribunal wrongly excluded an overseas business when considering the date of a TUPE transfer.

⚖️Education Minister confirms that government “Returnships” programme to retrain the over 50s will not proceed.

⚖️High Court finds that the benefit of a non-contractual share incentive plan did transfer under TUPE.

⚖️EAT finds ET was correct to reject employee’s unfair dismissal claim on the basis that there was a termination by mutual agreement, despite a subssequent letter stating he was dismissed.

⚖️EAT overturns ET decision that dismissal of NHS worker for angry outburst over a coffee cup was unfair due to failings in the procedure.

⚖️Bank fined £5.4m after energy traders used WhatsApp on private phones to discuss business in breach of rule to record messages linked to energy trading.

⚖️Birmingham City Council may receive government intervention in relation to the financial crisis caused by equal pay claim in excess of £750m.

⚖️EAT finds that tribunal erred in agreeing to let an unpursued claim continue without obtaining evidence that the legal representative had blanket authority to continue the claim in his absence

m. 07752 370149   
e.  emma.mcilveen@barlibrary.com
Bar of NI Profile
The Bar Library, 91 Chichester Street, Belfast, BT1 3JQ, Northern Ireland

Tweet Tweet

Forward Forward

Copyright © 2020, Emma McIlveen, Barrister at Law, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer 

This bulletin is published by Emma McIlveen, Barrister at Law. Please note that the information and any commentary on the law contained in this bulletin is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by the author or the publisher.

The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. If you are not a solicitor, you are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site. If you are a solicitor, you should seek advice from Counsel on a formal basis.

Twitter

Website

Email

LinkedIn


This email was sent to *|EMAIL|*

why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences

*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*