January Newsletter

*|MC:SUBJECT|*
"For there is always light, if only we're brave enough to see it. If only we're brave enough to be it"
AMANDA GORMAN- THE HILL WE CLIMB
WORKING FROM HOME/ MENTAL WELL-BEING 
With a lot of employers continuing to work from home, HSENI have released an information leaflet with useful advice and tips for both staff and employers on how to reduce work- related stress while working from home.  See here for more information. 
FURLOUGH NUMBERS RISE IN NORTHERN IRELAND 
CHANGES TO OFF- PAYROLL WORKING RULES FROM 6 APRIL 2021
OPPOSITION DAY DEBATE 

An Opposition Day debate relating to employment rights, holiday pay and 48-hour weekly working limits took place on Monday 25 January 2021.

The title of the motion was “That this House believes that all existing employment rights and protections must be maintained, including the 48-hour working week, rest breaks at work and inclusion of overtime pay when calculating some holiday pay entitlements, and calls upon the Government to set out to Parliament by the end of January 2021 a timetable to introduce legislation to end “fire and re-hire” tactics.”

The full report is available here. 

FCA v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd and others [2021]: The Supreme Court has now delivered its judgment in the Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA)’s business interruption insurance test case. The Supreme Court substantially allowed the FCA’s appeal on behalf of policyholders. This completes the legal process for impacted policies and means that many thousands of policyholders will now have their claims for coronavirus-related business interruption losses paid. 

In response, the FCA issued the following statement: 

"The judgment brings to an end legal arguments under 14 types of policy issued by six insurers, and a substantial number of similar policies in the wider market which will now lead to claims being successful. 

The FCA’s decision to bring the test case has removed the need for policyholders to resolve many key issues individually with their insurers.  It enabled them to benefit from the expert legal team assembled by the FCA, providing a comparatively quick and cost-effective solution to the legal uncertainty in the business interruption insurance market.

The test case was not intended to encompass all possible disputes, but to resolve some key contractual uncertainties and 'causation' issues to provide clarity for policyholders and insurers. Today's judgment does not determine how much is payable under individual policies, but provides much of the basis for doing so.

Following the High Court's judgment, insurers decided to pay claims on some policies and we asked insurers to progress claims on other policies that the High Court said provided cover so that they could be settled quickly following the appeals to the Supreme Court. 

We will now work with insurers so that they rapidly conclude their claims processes on claims that the Supreme Court has said should be paid, providing interim payments wherever possible.   

Each policy needs to be considered against the detailed judgment to work out what it means for that policy. Policyholders with affected claims can expect to hear from their insurer soon. Policyholders with questions should approach their broker, other advisers or insurer.  Policyholders who remain unhappy following their insurer's assessment of their claim may be able to refer their claim to the Financial Ombudsman Service, whose role is to resolve individual disputes"

⚖️  Five employment law cases that will shape 2021

⚖️  Seven in 10 requests for furlough by working mums rejected, TUC study reveals

⚖️  NI health trusts 'named and shamed' over not paying minimum wage

⚖️  Employment: Temporary jobs for UK workers 'surge in December'

⚖️  Accrington Iceland 'unfairly sacked' woman left disabled after attack

⚖️  Royal Mail ordered to pay £230,000 to harassed Hindu ex-worker

⚖️ Car worker who missed 808 shifts wins unfair dismissal decision

⚖️ New mother wins payout of up to £9k after she was left out of Christmas party while on maternity leave

⚖️ Dad rejected from job ‘because he wouldn’t fit in with millennial women’

ONE TO WATCH: A judicial review has been launched against the Chancellor for indirect sex discrimination in the. Self-Employment Income Support Scheme (SEISS). See this link for more information about this challenge. 
Decisions from Northern Ireland Tribunals are published here. 

The President of the Tribunals issued updated guidance on the 20th January 2021. 

The Tribunal building is currently closed and will remain closed until at least 5th February 2021. Case management discussions are continuing to take place remotely. 
ADVANCED DIPLOMA IN APPLIED EMPLOYMENT LAW 
DATA PROTECTION AND EMPLOYMENT LAW WITH CLÍONA KIMBER SC

This session discussed home working & how to meet GDPR & data security obligations. 

The broad picture is that GDPR is not a block to fighting Covid-19. Andrea Jelinek, Chair of the European Data Protection Board (EDPB), said:

“Data protection rules (such as GDPR) do not hinder measures taken in the fight against the coronavirus pandemic. However, I would like to underline that, even in these exceptional times, the data controller must ensure the protection of the personal data of the data subjects. Therefore, a number of considerations should be taken into account to guarantee the lawful processing of personal data.”

Despite the Covid challenges, guidance reminds employers that compliance does not need to be complicated, and what is needed to comply.

The following five steps capture what is needed- in words that can be applied more widely to data protection:

a. Only ask people for the specific information;
b. Be clear, open and honest with people about what is being done with their personal information;
c. Keep people’s data secure. Organisations should not use open storage, and should ensure their customers’ personal information is kept private;
d. Do not use the personal information collected for contact tracing for other purposes, such as direct marketing, profiling or data analytics; and
e. Erase or dispose of the personal information collected after a reasonable period - for Covid 21 days is recommended.
The Employment Lawyers Group in Northern Ireland will hold their AGM virtually on the 4th February 2021 at 1pm. Please see the AGM notice attached for more information. 
m. 07752 370149   
e.  emma.mcilveen@barlibrary.com
Bar of NI Profile
The Bar Library, 91 Chichester Street, Belfast, BT1 3JQ, Northern Ireland
Tweet Tweet
Forward Forward
Copyright © 2020, Emma McIlveen, Barrister at Law, All rights reserved.

Disclaimer 

This bulletin is published by Emma McIlveen, Barrister at Law. Please note that the information and any commentary on the law contained in this bulletin is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by the author or the publisher.

The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. If you are not a solicitor, you are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site. If you are a solicitor, you should seek advice from Counsel on a formal basis.
Twitter
Website
Email
LinkedIn






This email was sent to *|EMAIL|*
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
*|LIST:ADDRESSLINE|*