EAT UPHOLDS TRIBUNAL DECISION TO DISMISS DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION CLAIM AND FINDS THERE WAS NO USEFUL PURPOSE TO EXPUNGE AN EXPIRED WARNING AS A REASONABLE ADJUSTMENT
EAT FINDS TRIBUNAL ERRED BY FAILING TO CONSIDER IF IT WAS A REASONABLE ADJUSTMENT TO DELAY DISMISSAL OF A DISABLED EMPLOYEE UNTIL MERGER WAS COMPLETE AND OTHER ROLES BECAME AVAILABLE
TWITTER ORDERED TO PAY SENIOR EXEC €550,000 IN UNFAIR DISMISSAL CLAIM: FAILURE TO TICK A BOX AGREEING NEW Ts & Cs WITHIN A ONE-DAY DEADLINE DID NOT CONSTITUTE A RESIGNATION
GOVERNMENT ANNOUNCES INTENTION TO REPEAL STRIKES ACT 2023 STATING “ATTEMPTING TO CLAMP DOWN ON THE FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOM OF WORKING PEOPLE HAS GOT US NOWHERE”
This bulletin is published by Emma McIlveen, Barrister at Law. Please note that the information and any commentary on the law contained in this bulletin is provided free of charge for information purposes only. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by the author or the publisher.
The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal advice to any person on a specific case or matter. If you are not a solicitor, you are strongly advised to obtain specific, personal advice from a lawyer about your case or matter and not to rely on the information or comments on this site. If you are a solicitor, you should seek advice from Counsel on a formal basis.
