Simpson v Health and Care Professions Council [2023] EWHC 481
For the full judgment click HERE
The case concerned the Appeal of a psychologist against his suspension as a result of making “racially motivated” social media posts. The registrant’s appeal included submissions that the comments were made in a closed group that he believed to be private, that he was not a racist person, and that his motivation was of humour not racism. At paragraph 24 iii) Fordham J stated there were two elements to “racially motivated” “(i) that the act in question had a purpose behind it which at least in significant part was referable to race; and (ii) that that the act was done in a way showing hostility or a discriminatory attitude to the relevant racial group” He stated at para 24 (iv) “hostility can thrive in attempted ‘humour,’ as it can in ‘ridicule.'”
|